Bibliography

Filters: Keyword is Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic  [Clear All Filters]
B
Boutron I, Estellat C, Guittet L, et al. "Methods of blinding in reports of randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacologic treatments: a systematic review." PLoS Med.. 2006;3(10):e425. Abstract
C
Carter AO, Griffin GH, Carter TP. "A survey identified publication bias in the secondary literature." J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(3):241-5. Abstract
de Craen AJM, van Vliet HAAM, Helmerhorst FM. "An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment." J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):311-3. Abstract
Crumley ET, Wiebe N, Cramer K, Klassen TP, Hartling L. "Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:24. Abstract
D
Druss BG, Marcus SC. "Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine." J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93(4):499-501.
E
Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. "Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records." Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1635-40. Abstract
G
Gluud LL, Sørensen TIA, Gøtzsche PC, Gluud C. "The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials." Am. J. Gastroenterol.. 2005;100(11):2431-5. Abstract
Golder S, Loke Y, McIntosh HM. "Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:3. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias)." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407-15. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303-10. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294-302. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277-82. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1283-93. Abstract
H
Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, et al. "Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study." BMJ. 2009;339:b4012. Abstract
Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, et al. "CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration." PLoS Med.. 2008;5(1):e20. Abstract
K
Kastner M, Straus SE, McKibbon AK, Goldsmith CH. "The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):149-57. Abstract
L
Langer G, Meerpohl JJ, Perleth M, Gartlehner G, Kaminski-Hartenthaler A, Schünemann H. "[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables]." Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. Abstract
Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A. "Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:32. Abstract
M
MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russell IT, Black AM. "A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies." Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(34):1-154. Abstract
Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. "Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials." Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713-21. Abstract
Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP. "The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews." Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(41):1-90. Abstract
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. "Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses." Lancet. 1999;354(9193):1896-900. Abstract
Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, et al. "A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(11):1095-1104. Abstract
P
Peinemann F, McGauran N, Sauerland S, Lange S. "Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:41. Abstract
R
Reveiz L, Cardona AF, Ospina EG, de Agular S. "An e-mail survey identified unpublished studies for systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):755-8. Abstract