Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is Technology Assessment, Biomedical [Clear All Filters]
Locating systematic reviews of test accuracy studies: how five specialist review databases measure up." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(4):403-11. Abstract
"
Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?" Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(2):iii-iv, 1-146. Abstract
"
Identifying observational studies of surgical interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:41. Abstract
"
How well do search filters perform in identifying economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(4):522-9. Abstract
"
[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables]." Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. Abstract
"
A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies." Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(34):1-154. Abstract
"
The usefulness of the NHS Economic Evaluation Database to researchers undertaking technology assessment reviews." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(3):249-57. Abstract
"
Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(4):591-603. Abstract
"
Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system." Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. Abstract
"
An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):944-52. Abstract
"
Association between methodological characteristics and outcome in health technology assessments which included case series." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):277-87. Abstract
"