Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is Review Literature as Topic [Clear All Filters]
2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group." Spine. 2009;34(18):1929-41. Abstract
"
Age-specific search strategies for Medline." J. Med. Internet Res.. 2006;8(4):e25. Abstract
"
An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:33. Abstract
"
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. Abstract
"
An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment." J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):311-3. Abstract
"
Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews." J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(1):21-9. Abstract
"
Appraising the quality of qualitative research." Midwifery. 2006;22(2):108-19. Abstract
"
Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?" Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. Abstract
"
Are we there yet? When is a literature review complete?" Am J Nurs. 2009;109(9):78-9.
"
Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(1):168-78. Abstract
"
The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):149-57. Abstract
"
Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE." J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94(4):451-5.
"
A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review." Community Dent Health. 2004;21(2):138-42. Abstract
"
Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline." Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(3):203-10. Abstract
"
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10. Abstract
"
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. Abstract
"
Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):974-81. Abstract
"
Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:41. Abstract
"
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?" BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:27. Abstract
"
"
EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):29-33. Abstract
"
Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency." J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1057-63. Abstract
"
Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):8. Abstract
"
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:9. Abstract
"
An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):944-52. Abstract
"