Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is Review Literature as Topic [Clear All Filters]
Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?" Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. Abstract
"
[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables]." Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. Abstract
"
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy." Ann. Intern. Med.. 2008;149(12):889-97. Abstract
"
Impact of adjustment for quality on results of metaanalyses of diagnostic accuracy." Clin. Chem.. 2007;53(2):164-72. Abstract
"
"
A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(11):1095-1104. Abstract
"
Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey." BMJ. 2005;330(7482):68. Abstract
"
Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):138-42. Abstract
"
Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:41. Abstract
"
Guidance on conducting a literature search and reviewing mixed literature." Nurs Stand. 2009;23(24):43-9; quiz 50, 52. Abstract
"
Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline?" J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):320; author reply 321.
"
"
Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(4):591-603. Abstract
"
An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:33. Abstract
"
Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency." J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1057-63. Abstract
"
Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(8):755-62. Abstract
"
No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(8):748-54. Abstract
"
An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):944-52. Abstract
"
Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(1):168-78. Abstract
"
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10. Abstract
"
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?" BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:27. Abstract
"
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. Abstract
"
Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy." Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4(4):157-62. Abstract
"
Are we there yet? When is a literature review complete?" Am J Nurs. 2009;109(9):78-9.
"
A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification." J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(1):20-5. Abstract
"