Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is Quality Control [Clear All Filters]
An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment." J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):311-3. Abstract
"
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies." Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Abstract
"
Identifying observational studies of surgical interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:41. Abstract
"
Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review." J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(2):84-92. Abstract
"
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound and relevant causation studies in EMBASE." BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:8. Abstract
"
Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment." Acad Radiol. 2006;13(7):803-10. Abstract
"
Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and text-word searches in MEDLINE to retrieve studies on sleep in healthy individuals." J Med Libr Assoc. 2004;92(3):349-53. Abstract
"
A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:22. Abstract
"
Impact of adjustment for quality on results of metaanalyses of diagnostic accuracy." Clin. Chem.. 2007;53(2):164-72. Abstract
"
"
A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies." Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(34):1-154. Abstract
"
Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials." Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713-21. Abstract
"
Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis." Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1189-208. Abstract
"
Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse." Health Res Policy Syst. 2011;9:43. Abstract
"
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10. Abstract
"
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?" BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:27. Abstract
"
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. Abstract
"
Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale." Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(4):385-401. Abstract
"
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:9. Abstract
"
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. Abstract
"
No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:19. Abstract
"
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE." J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94(1):41-7. Abstract
"
Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews." J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(1):21-9. Abstract
"