Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is Research Design [Clear All Filters]
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294-302. Abstract
"
Are we there yet? When is a literature review complete?" Am J Nurs. 2009;109(9):78-9.
"
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. Abstract
"
Guidance on conducting a literature search and reviewing mixed literature." Nurs Stand. 2009;23(24):43-9; quiz 50, 52. Abstract
"
2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group." Spine. 2009;34(18):1929-41. Abstract
"
Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(8):838-844.e3. Abstract
"
Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review." J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(2):84-92. Abstract
"
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies." BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1106-10.
"
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy." Ann. Intern. Med.. 2008;149(12):889-97. Abstract
"
Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale." Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(4):385-401. Abstract
"
Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies." J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):357-364. Abstract
"
Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:41. Abstract
"
An epidemiological appraisal instrument - a tool for evaluation of epidemiological studies." Ergonomics. 2007;50(6):920-60. Abstract
"
Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography." Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(3):666-76. Abstract
"
Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:32. Abstract
"
Appraising the quality of qualitative research." Midwifery. 2006;22(2):108-19. Abstract
"
An e-mail survey identified unpublished studies for systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):755-8. Abstract
"
Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies." CMAJ. 2006;174(4):469-76. Abstract
"
Age-specific search strategies for Medline." J. Med. Internet Res.. 2006;8(4):e25. Abstract
"
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?" BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:27. Abstract
"
Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:3. Abstract
"
Association between methodological characteristics and outcome in health technology assessments which included case series." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):277-87. Abstract
"
The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials." Am. J. Gastroenterol.. 2005;100(11):2431-5. Abstract
"
An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment." J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(3):311-3. Abstract
"
Violation of the intent-to-treat principle and rate of missing data in superiority trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatic diseases." Arthritis Rheum.. 2005;52(6):1858-65. Abstract
"