Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is Research Design [Clear All Filters]
Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:41. Abstract
"
"
Guidance on conducting a literature search and reviewing mixed literature." Nurs Stand. 2009;23(24):43-9; quiz 50, 52. Abstract
"
An e-mail survey identified unpublished studies for systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):755-8. Abstract
"
Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system." Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. Abstract
"
Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies." CMAJ. 2006;174(4):469-76. Abstract
"
Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography." Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(3):666-76. Abstract
"
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies." BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1106-10.
"
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. Abstract
"
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?" BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:27. Abstract
"
Are we there yet? When is a literature review complete?" Am J Nurs. 2009;109(9):78-9.
"
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?" Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18. Abstract
"
Association between methodological characteristics and outcome in health technology assessments which included case series." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):277-87. Abstract
"
Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale." Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(4):385-401. Abstract
"
Appraising the quality of qualitative research." Midwifery. 2006;22(2):108-19. Abstract
"
A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools." J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(1):1-12. Abstract
"
Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies." J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):357-364. Abstract
"