Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is N  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M [N] O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
9
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. "9. Developing and wording guideline recommendations.". In: The guidelines manual.; 2009.
A
Nelson AM. "Addressing the threat of evidence-based medicine practice to qualitative inquiry through increasing attention to quality: a discussion paper." International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2008;45:6.
B
Nishimura K, Rasool F, Ferguson MB, Sobel M, Niederman R. "Benchmarking the clinical prosthetic dental literature on MEDLINE." J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(5):533-41. Abstract
C
Boyce C, Neale P. Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input . Watertown, USA: Pathfinder International; 2006.
D
Astin MP, Brazzelli MG, Fraser CM, Counsell CE, Needham G, Grimshaw JM. "Developing a sensitive search strategy in MEDLINE to retrieve studies on assessment of the diagnostic performance of imaging techniques." Radiology. 2008;247(2):365-73. Abstract
G
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383-94. Abstract
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes." Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2012. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables-binary outcomes." Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2012. Abstract
Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations." J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):719-25. Abstract
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401-6. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias)." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407-15. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277-82. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294-302. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303-10. Abstract
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. "GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence." J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1311-6. Abstract
L
van Nes F, Abma T, Jonsson H, Deeg D. "Language differences in qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation?" Eur J Ageing. 2010;7(4):313-316. Abstract
M
Wilczynski NL, Garg AX, Haynes B. "A method for defining a journal subset for a clinical discipline using the bibliographies of systematic reviews." Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):721-4. Abstract
U
Nixon J, Duffy S, Armstrong N, et al. "The usefulness of the NHS Economic Evaluation Database to researchers undertaking technology assessment reviews." Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(3):249-57. Abstract
W
Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. "The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions." ACP J. Club. 1995;123(3):A12-3.