Bibliography
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is B [Clear All Filters]
L’entretien de groupe : considérations théoriques et méthodologiques." Recherches Qualitatives. 2010;29(1).
"
2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group." Spine. 2009;34(18):1929-41. Abstract
"
An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:33. Abstract
"
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013-20. Abstract
"
Appraising the quality of randomized controlled trials: inter-rater reliability for the OTseeker evidence database." J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(6):547-55. Abstract
"
Are we there yet? When is a literature review complete?" Am J Nurs. 2009;109(9):78-9.
"
Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:7. Abstract
"
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?" BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1115-7.
"
A comparison of the coverage of clinical medicine provided by PASCAL BIOMED and MEDLINE." Health Info Libr J. 2001;18(2):110-6. Abstract
"
Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input . Watertown, USA: Pathfinder International; 2006.
Consensus development methods." In: Pope C, Mays N, eds. Qualitative research in health care. 3rd ed. Blackwell Publishing/ BMJ Books; 2006:.
"
"
Developing search strategies in Medline on the occupational origin of diseases." Am. J. Ind. Med.. 2006;49(2):127-37. Abstract
"
Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies." Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(25):iii, 1-234. Abstract
"
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10. Abstract
"
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. Abstract
"
Development of two search strategies for literature in MEDLINE-PubMed: nursing diagnoses in the context of evidence-based nursing." Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2005;16(2):26-32. Abstract
"
Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? Results of a randomized trial." Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1997.
"
Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group." Lancet. 1997;350(9072):185-6.
"
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?" BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:27. Abstract
"
"
Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):8. Abstract
"
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies." BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:9. Abstract
"
Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies." CMAJ. 2006;174(4):469-76. Abstract
"
Filtering Medline for a clinical discipline: diagnostic test assessment framework." BMJ. 2009;339:b3435. Abstract
"